Podcast Lecture of the Week


Serge Mombouli, a longtime adviser to Congo’s president, says the West pushes for intangible achievements like better government, while China supports tangible things.

“Tangible development means you can see, you can touch,” Mombouli says. “We need both. We cannot be talking just about democracy, transparency, good governance. At the end of the day the population does not have anything to eat, does not have water to drink, no electricity at night, industry to provide work, so we need both. People do not eat democracy.

Read more here:

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=11428653

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

The McLaughlin Group last week (05/25) posted an excellent discussion regarding the delicate balance between faith and politics, the involvement of religion in the public square.

Here are a few excerpts:

Barry Goldwater on Religion:

Mclaughlin Group_05.25_Goldwater on Religion.mp3

“There is no position on which people are so immovable as their religious belief. There is no more powerful ally one can claim in a debate than Jesus Christ or God or Allah or whatever one calls the supreme being. But like any powerful weapon, the use of God’s name on one’s behalf should be used sparingly. The religious factions that are growing throughout our land are not using their religious clout with wisdom. They are trying to force government leaders into following their position 100 percent. If you disagree with these religious groups on a particular moral issue, they complain. They threaten you with a loss of money or votes or both.

“I’m frankly sick and tired of the political preachers across this country telling me as a citizen that if I want to be a moral person, I must believe in A, B, C and D. Just who do they think they are, and from where do they presume to claim the right to dictate their moral beliefs to me? And I am even more angry as a legislator who must endure the threats of every religious group who thinks it has some God-granted right to control my vote on every roll call in the Senate. I am warning them today, I will fight them every step of the way if they try to dictate their moral convictions to all Americans in the name of conservatism.”

McGlaughlin: Is he still the conscience of conservatives? Is he more in line with what you were saying earlier than are the fundamentalists today?

Buchanan: No, look, they are both parts of the conservative movement. Barry Goldwater at one point was Mr. Conservative. But John, Martin Luther King invoked God in the battle for civil rights. The whole battle to overthrow slavery came out of a lot of the churches. Religion has always played a role in social reform in this country, and it’s got every right to state its case and make its voice heard.

Founding Fathers & Religion

Mclaughlin Group_05.25_The Framers on Religion.mp3

McLaughlin: Were the Founding Fathers afraid that an official religion might take root? Were they worried more about religion affecting statecraft or statecraft offending religion?

Walker: But they were good Bible-reading people, because what they understood was to render unto Caesar that which is Caesar’s and render unto God that which is God’s.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

A MUST LISTEN: The podcast lecture of the week is The New Dream: Updating MLK`s Vision (Feb 27, 2007 at Middlebury College, Rohatyn Center for International Affairs)–in which Van Jones (Executive Director of the Ella Baker Center for Human Rights) discusses the intersections of the significance of student involvement in the environmental movement, the “greening” of the economy, and issues of race and poverty in 21st century America.

HONORABLE MENTION: Tufts University hosted The `War on Terrorism`: Where Do We Stand?–a two-day conference sponsored by the Fares Center for Eastern Mediterranean Studies. This series of podcasts including nearly 12 hours of forums and lectures constitutes a veritable crash course exploring the roots of international terrorism, intercultural discourse, and the direction of U.S. foreign policy during the final two years of King George II’s ignominious reign.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

In this lecture discussing the U.S. war in Iraq and the relationship between our foreign policy over the last 30 years and the rapidly diminishing global oil supply, Michael T. Klare (Five College Professor of Peace and World Security Studies) delivers an absolutely blistering critique of BOTH political parties, but especially the Bush administration for flushing our nation’s future down the figurative toilet. I cannot recommend this podcast emphatically enough!

http://uc.princeton.edu/main/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1501

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

2007 Princeton Colloquium on Public and International Affairs

Richard Cizik is the chief lobbyist for the National Association of Evangelicals. In this panel entitled The Demands of God: Perspectives from the Evangelical Movement (panel 2), he speaks about his passion to apply his Christian, biblical values to the issue of global climate change–discussing the need to care for the Earth in overtly religious and moral terms.

Cizik’s Evangelical Climate Initiative represents an intriguing development for the Christian Right. For the first time in its more recent history, the evangelical movement is engaging on an issue that requires introspective critique rather than assault on an external “enemy”. This encouraging development possibly signals a newly-born maturity in evangelical Christianity.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!